Love, attract, and the inhibition from opinion of personal choice

Love, attract, and the inhibition from opinion of personal choice

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you can Individual Choices, 29(2), 119–126.

Cross-sectional analysis off closeness, appeal, and you may partnership: Assessment the brand new assumptions of the triangular idea away from like

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area of attachment into the people mating. Review of General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Internet paradox reviewed. Diary out-of Personal Points, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A social tech one decrease societal involvement and you may emotional really-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Meters., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, time, and you can duration of marriages and you can divorces. Latest Inhabitants Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Impression best about doing bad: Social evaluations within this close matchmaking. Log away from Personality and you will Personal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Diary of Character and Societal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention to attractive choice: This new changed mindset of matchmaking maintenance. Advancement and you can Peoples Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential data off dispute and you may accord inside distressed and you can nondistressed marital couples. Record of Contacting and you will Medical Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, A great. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Dating creation on the internet: What is the large destination? Journal of Societal Circumstances, 58(1), 9–31.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The key benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization together with construction away from fulfillment in romantic relationship. Journal of Personality and you may Public Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-review objectives in personal relationships: A type of global improvement and particular verification. Within the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Skills ents in the examination of partners telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Drive.

Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit knowledge off close competition

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-counselor thread through the contact out-of accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Theory, Search, Routine, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest personal monitoring system: Increased sensitiveness in order to societal signs while the an adaptive response to personal exemption. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The societal outcast: Ostracism, public difference, rejection, and you may intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Psychology Force.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). International and you can specific relational patterns on the contact with personal relations. Log of Identity and you will Societal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can information trying to into the intimate dating. Identity and you can Societal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will certain attachment representations from inside the adulthood: Will there be a relationship?. Diary Out of Societal And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A great. (2001)mitment and you will relationship fix systems. In J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate personal matchmaking: Restoration and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection myself impression one of partners just like the a purpose of this new similarity within their common feel. Personality And you may voordelige link Social Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Results of salience away from extrinsic advantages toward taste and you may loving. Record of Personality and you can Personal Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *